Lee v. Lee
District Court, W.D. Kentucky
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY LOUISVILLE DIVISION MIKE HOWARD LEE PLAINTIFF v. Civil Action No. 3:19-cv-172-RGJ WILLIE M. LEE, et al. DEFENDANTS * * * * * MEMORANDUM OPINION Pro se Plaintiff Mike Howard Lee filed the instant action. Because Plaintiff is proceeding in forma pauperis under 28 U.S.C. § 1915, the Court must undertake a preliminary review of the complaint. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e); McGore v. Wrigglesworth,
114 F.3d 601
(6th Cir. 1997), overruled on other grounds by Jones v. Bock,
549 U.S. 199
(2007). For the following reasons, the action will be dismissed.…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- West v. AtkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Jones v. BockSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.