Legal Opinion

Sutton v. Schregardus

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided April 4, 1994No. 93CA005699PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Baird, Judge.

This cause was heard upon the appeal of Kent Sutton, d.b.a. Sutton Tire Center, from a finding by the Ohio Environmental Board of Review, which found that the Director of the Ohio Environmental Protection Agency (“the director”) acted lawfully and reasonably in assessing a $250 penalty against Sutton. We affirm.

Sutton Tire Center is a facility licensed under Ohio Adm.Code Chapter 3745-26 to conduct inspections of automobiles in furtherance of Ohio’s Automobile Inspection and Maintenance program (“the AIM program”), codified at R.C. 3704.14 et seq. and Ohio Adm.Code 3745-26-11.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Armstrong v. ManzoSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Citizens Committee to Preserve Lake Logan v. WilliamsOhio Court of Appeals · 1977
  3. Lyle Construction, Inc. v. Ohio Department of Natural Resources, Division of ReclamationOhio Supreme Court · 1987
  4. North Sanitary Landfill, Inc. v. NicholsOhio Court of Appeals · 1984

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Stark-Tuscarawas-Wayne v. Rep. Waste Services of Ohio, 07ap-599 (5-7-2009)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API