Legal Opinion
Lyle Construction, Inc. v. Ohio Department of Natural Resources, Division of Reclamation
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided December 9, 1987No. 86-1753PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDouglas, J.
The instant appeal requires this court to determine whether the jurisdictionally required penalty prepayment provision set forth within R.C. 1513.02(F)(3) denies an insolvent mine operator due process of law or *24equal protection of the laws. For the reasons expressed infra, we answer this question in the negative.
“It is axiomatic that all legislative enactments enjoy a presumption of constitutionality. Benevolent Assn. v. Parma (1980), 61 Ohio St. 2d 375, 377 [15 O.O. 3d 450]; State, ex rel. Taft, v. Campanella (1977), 50 Ohio St. 2d 242, 246 [4 O.O. 3d 423]; State, ex rel. Dickman, v.…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- San Antonio Independent School District v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Armstrong v. ManzoSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Conley v. ShearerOhio Supreme Court · 1992
- Sedar v. Knowlton Construction Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1990
- Vargo v. Travelers InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1987
- Conley v. ShearerOhio Supreme Court · 1992
- Adamsky v. Buckeye Local School Dist.Ohio Supreme Court · 1995
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.