Simonson v. "U" District Office Building Corp.
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Langenbach, J.† —
Plaintiffs are architects suing to recover for services performed for defendant corporation. (The Metropolitan Life Insurance Company was a nominal defendant and will not be further mentioned.) Since both parties are appealing they will be referred to by their original designations; plaintiffs will be referred to as Simonson.
The trial was to the court and over a period of days some 117 exhibits were received. We have examined those exhibits and have digested the nearly 800 page statement of facts. There was testimony and proof from which the trial court could have found the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Brooks v. WarnerWashington Supreme Court · 1957
- Gannon v. EmtmanWashington Supreme Court · 1965
3Cited by6 opinions
- Hoffman v. Reinke Manufacturing Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1987
- Orsi v. AETNA INSURANCECourt of Appeals of Washington · 1985
- Kreger v. HallWashington Supreme Court · 1967
- Continental Insurance v. Paccar, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1980
- Southwest Washington Production Credit Ass'n v. Seattle-First National BankCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1978
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.