Legal Opinion
In re the Complaint of ENSCO Offshore Co.
District Court, S.D. Texas
Decided March 26, 2014No. Civ. A. No. H-09-2838PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
MELÍNDA HARMON, District Judge.
Pending before the Court in the above referenced cause of exoneration from or limitation of liability pursuant to 46 U.S.C. § 30501 et seq.,1 civil and maritime, is Plaintiff ENSCO Offshore Company’s (“ENSCO’s”) motion for summary judgment against Sea Robin Pipeline Company, LLC (“Sea Robin”) (# 98) on the grounds that Sea Robin cannot prove the ENSCO 74 allided with Sea Robin’s pipeline.
Background Facts
ENSCO was the sole owner of the EN-SCO 74, a self-elevating drilling unit and a registered vessel of Panama, Official No. 8764420, approximately…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Lujan v. National Wildlife FederationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- International Shortstop, Inc., and Sam Talkington v. Rally's, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Galaxy Lights Ltd. v. PriestleyDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 2022
- North Atlantic Security Company v. BlacheDistrict Court, M.D. Louisiana · 2025