Legal Opinion

Gawthrop v. Fairmont Coal Co.

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided April 7, 1914PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Error to Circuit Court, Harrison County. Action by John A. Gawthrop against the Fairmont Coal Company. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Robinson, Judge :

This is another step in the ease reported in 68 W. Va. 650. The action is one for the recovery of the statutory penalty of five hundred dollars, which accrues in favor of the owner of land containing coal as against an adjoining owner who mines the coal vein within five feet of the division line. Code 1913, ch. 79, sec. 7.

*40When the ease went back for trial, defendant tendered a plea that the cause of action did not accrue within one year prior to the institution of the suit. That plea was rejected. At the trial, plaintiff was permitted to show a violation of the statute within…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Schreiber v. SharplessSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. State v. B. & O. R. R.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1879
  3. Wilson v. ShraderWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Hall v. Norfolk & W. R.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1897
  5. State v. Railroad Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1910

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Snodgrass v. Sisson's Mobile Home Sales, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Petrelli v. West Virginia-Pittsburgh Coal Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1920
  3. State Ex Rel. Smith v. Kermit Lumber & Pressure Treating Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Knight v. Chesapeake Coal Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Sabatino v. RichardsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1945

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API