Legal Opinion

Berner v. Schlesinger

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 10, 1957PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFelix C. Benvenga, J.

This is an action to recover the sum of $27,745.56, based upon alleged transfers of moneys in the form of checks issued by a bankrupt to defendant. The complaint pleads, in the alternative, causes of action based upon the theory of (1) moneys loaned, and (2) fraudulent conveyances. The defense is that the checks were given in payment for returned merchandise. This claim is based mainly on defendant’s own testimony on direct examination. On cross-examination, defendant refused to answer relevant questions and to produce relevant books and papers, invoking the privilege against self…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Raffel v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. The People v. . ColeNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
  3. People v. ConnollyNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
  4. Matter of GraeNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
  5. State v. WentworthSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1875

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Conkling v. ConklingSupreme Court of Iowa · 1971
  2. Alvarez v. SanchezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  3. B. B. S. v. R. C. B.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1971
  4. Meyer v. SECOND JUDICIAL DIST. COURT, ETC.Nevada Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Bbs v. RcbDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1971

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API