Legal Opinion

Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company and Riker Laboratories, Inc., and Alphapharm Pty. Ltd. v. Barr Laboratories, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided May 1, 2002No. 01-1369, 01-1370Published

1Opinion of the Court

289 F.3d 775

MINNESOTA MINING AND MANUFACTURING COMPANY and Riker Laboratories, Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellants, and

Alphapharm Pty. Ltd., Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

BARR LABORATORIES, INC., Defendant-Appellee.

No. 01-1369.

No. 01-1370.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

May 1, 2002.

Donald R. Dunner, Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, L.L.P., of Washington, DC, argued for plaintiffs-appellants. On the brief were Allen M. Sokal, Charles E. Lipsey, David S. Forman, and Gregory A. Chopskie. Of counsel on the brief were Kevin H. Rhodes, and MarySusan Howard, Office of Intellectual…

Also in this document: Concurring in the judgment.

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. City of Erie v. Pap's A. M.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Northwest Airlines, Inc. v. Transport Workers UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Asarco Inc. v. KadishSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Mova Pharmaceutical Corp. v. ShalalaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API