Legal Opinion
(PC) Hunt v. Diaz
District Court, E.D. California
Decided March 3, 2020No. 1:19-cv-00504Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MARK HUNT, ) Case No.: 1:19-cv-00504-DAD-SAB (PC) ) 12 Plaintiff, ) ) ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION 13 v. ) FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL OR GUARDIAN AD LITEM, WITHOUT PREJUDICE 14 D. DIAZ, et al., ) ) [ECF No. 29] 15 Defendants. ) ) 16 ) ) 17 ) 18 Plaintiff Mark Hunt is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action 19 pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 20 Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion for appointment of counsel or guardian ad 21 litem, filed February 28, 2020. 22 I. 23…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Mallard v. United States Dist. Court for Southern Dist. of IowaSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Frederick C. Wilborn v. Antonio Escalderon and Ruth RushenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Lee A. Rand v. James Rowland Nadim Khoury, M.D. William Bunnell Roy Lee Johnson Leo R. EstesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- Ernest Lee Allen v. Art CalderonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Krain v. SmallwoodCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.