Legal Opinion

Ritter v. Technicolor Corp.

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 11, 1972No. Civ. 30402PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

DRAPER, P. J.

By California statute, release of an agent before trial does not discharge his principal from tort liability, even though the sole basis alleged for recovery from the principal is his vicarious liability for the acts of his agent.

Plaintiffs’ complaint alleges that defendants Filmland Corp. and two individuals who dominated it made knowingly false representations to plaintiffs to induce them to enter into contracts with Filmland for distribution of films to be made or processed by co-defendants Technicolor Corporation and Eastman Kodak Company. Filmland and the individuals…

2Cited by24 opinions

  1. Mesler v. Bragg Management Co.California Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Alaska Airlines, Inc. v. SweatAlaska Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Craven v. LawsonTennessee Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Barney v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.California Court of Appeal · 1986
  5. Bostick v. Flex Equip. Co., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2007

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API