Ritter v. Technicolor Corp.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
DRAPER, P. J.
By California statute, release of an agent before trial does not discharge his principal from tort liability, even though the sole basis alleged for recovery from the principal is his vicarious liability for the acts of his agent.
Plaintiffs’ complaint alleges that defendants Filmland Corp. and two individuals who dominated it made knowingly false representations to plaintiffs to induce them to enter into contracts with Filmland for distribution of films to be made or processed by co-defendants Technicolor Corporation and Eastman Kodak Company. Filmland and the individuals…
2Cited by24 opinions
- Mesler v. Bragg Management Co.California Supreme Court · 1985
- Alaska Airlines, Inc. v. SweatAlaska Supreme Court · 1977
- Craven v. LawsonTennessee Supreme Court · 1976
- Barney v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.California Court of Appeal · 1986
- Bostick v. Flex Equip. Co., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2007
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.