Legal Opinion

Chauncey Hollis v. Raymond Madden

District Court, C.D. California

Decided June 5, 2023No. 2:21-cv-06272Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CHAUNCEY HOLLIS, Case No. 2:21-cv-06272-JC 12 13 Petitioner, MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR 14 v. WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS AND DISMISSING ACTION 15 RAYMOND MADDEN, Warden, 16 Respondent. 17 18 I. SUMMARY 19 On July 28, 2021,1 petitioner Chauncey Hollis, who is proceeding pro se, 20 constructively filed a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in State 21 Custody pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 2254

(“Petition”), along with an Addendum 22 (“Pet. Addendum”). Petitioner, who represented himself at…

2Cases cited52 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Harrington v. RichterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  4. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Schlup v. DeloSupreme Court of the United States · 1995

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API