Legal Opinion

State v. Mayor of Orange

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided November 15, 1891PublishedCited by 20 opinions

On certiorari. This writ brings up an ordinance to open- a- street in the-city of Orange, together with all the proceedings touching the-same. Argued at June Term, 1891, before Justices Depue, Dixon and Reed.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Reed, J.

The objection most strenuously pressed against-this ordinance is that its passage was not a- legitimate exercise-of the power to take land for public use.

It is first -insisted that the land of the prosecutor is not taken for the benefit of the public, but to subserve the interests of private individuals.

It is secondly insisted that the judgment of the body which was to decide upon the question whether the street should be-laid across the land of the prosecutor was improperly influenced by an offer of private persons to- pay a portion of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. Inhabitants of CambridgeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1810
  2. Pepin County v. PrindleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Patridge v. BallardSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1822

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Conners v. City of LowellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
  2. Township of West Orange v. 769 Associates, L.L.C.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2002
  3. Township of West Orange v. 769 ASSOCIATES, LLCSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2009
  4. Adair v. McElreathSupreme Court of Georgia · 1928
  5. State Ex Rel. Vickers v. Board of County CommissionersMontana Supreme Court · 1926

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API