Legal Opinion

Schovee v. Mikolasko

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided September 21, 1999No. 4, Sept. Term, 1999PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILNER, Judge.

The basic issue before us is whether the Circuit Court for Howard County erred in its application of the doctrine of implied negative reciprocal easement. The court subjected a 50-acre lot that was included in the subdivision plat of a 25-lot development community to restrictive covenants contained in a separately recorded Declaration of Covenants, Easements, Conditions and Restrictions, notwithstanding that the lot was not included in that Declaration, upon a finding from other evidence that the lot was intended by the developer to be part of the community. The Court of Special…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Turner v. BrocatoCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1973
  2. McKenrick v. Savings BankCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1938
  3. Scholtes v. McColganCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1945
  4. Thruston v. MinkeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1870
  5. Tischler v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1981

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Colandrea v. Wilde Lake Community Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
  2. CR-RSC Tower I, LLC v. RSC Tower I, LLCCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2012
  3. Garfink v. Cloisters at Charles, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
  4. Roper v. CamusoCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2003
  5. Point's Reach Condominium Council of Unit Owners v. Point Homeowners Ass'nCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2013

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API