Legal Opinion · Dissent

North Highland Inc. v. Jefferson Machine & Tool Inc.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided July 6, 2017No. 2015AP000643Published

1DissentPatience Drake Roggensack, C.J.

{dissenting).

¶ 47. The review before us arises from sum-

mary judgment. I conclude that defendants,1 as the *518moving party to whom summary judgment was granted, failed to make a prima facie showing of sufficient undisputed, material facts that North Highland Inc.'s bid to construct and supply Tyson Foods, Inc. with 3,000 trolleys, (the Trolley Contract) did not meet the definition of a trade secret as set out in Wis. Stat. § 134.90(1)(c), which Fredrick A. Wells (Wells) and Jefferson Machine & Tool, Inc. (Jefferson Machine) misappropriated. Leske v. Leske, 197 Wis. 2d 92, 96-97, 539 N.W.2d 719…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Pierringer v. HogerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Northern States Power Co. v. BugherWisconsin Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Defiance Button MacHine Company v. C & C Metal Products Corp. And Defiance Button MacHine Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
  4. Minuteman, Inc. v. AlexanderWisconsin Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Hoida, Inc. v. M & I MIDSTATE BANKWisconsin Supreme Court · 2006

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API