Legal Opinion

Gimbert v. Heinsath

Cuyahoga Circuit Court

Decided March 15, 1896Published

1Opinion of the Court

Caldwell, J. *

The plaintiffs in error filed a petition in the court of common pleas setting up in substance that the defendant, Jennie Madden, entered into a written contract with the defendant, H..A. Heinsath, sometime prior to the 21st day of June, 1895, whereby the said Heinsath agreed to furnish all materials and labor necessary for the complete construction of a two-story frame house for her upon a parcel of land (fully described) in Cleveland, Ohio; said Jennie Madden agreed to pay therefor the sum of $2,397.50 as the work progressed. The entire sum to be paid within sixty days from the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Cole Manufacturing Co. v. FallsTennessee Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Colter v. FreseIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
  3. Henry & Coatsworth Co. v. EvansSupreme Court of Missouri · 1888
  4. James Hunter & Co. v. Truckee LodgeNevada Supreme Court · 1879
  5. Kellogg v. HowesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API