Legal Opinion

Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. James

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided June 29, 1937No. 8 Div. 561PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

.SAMFORD, Judge.

The suit in this case was originally brought on one count, declared on a life insurance policy. The complaint was afterwards amended by filing counts 2 and 3 and by striking out count 1. Each of them claimed of the defendant $1,000, due on a policy of life insurance on the life of Roosevelt James. Sufficient . allegations were made of the death of the insured and of the ownership of the policy by the plaintiff.

As thus filed, the action was just a plain simple suit on an insurance policy, but, through four trials in the nisi prius court and four appeals, the pleadings have…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Cook & Laurie Contracting Co. v. BellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1912
  2. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. JamesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934
  3. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. JamesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
  4. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. JamesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. JamesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
  2. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. JamesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API