Legal Opinion

Middleton v. Margulis

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided August 4, 1987No. Docket 90516Published

1Opinion of the Court

162 Mich. App. 218 (1987)

412 N.W.2d 268

MIDDLETON

v.

MARGULIS

Docket No. 90516.

Michigan Court of Appeals.

Decided August 4, 1987.

Lopatin, Miller, Freedman, Bluestone, Erlich, Rosen & Bartnick (by Monica Farris Linkner), for plaintiffs.

Plunkett, Cooney, Rutt, Watters, Stanczyk & Pedersen, P.C. (by Robert G. Kamenec), for defendants.

Before: D.E. HOLBROOK, JR., P.J., and SULLIVAN and M. WARSHAWSKY,[*] JJ.

2Per curiam

Plaintiffs appeal as of right, from the circuit court orders granting defendants' motion to bar plaintiffs' expert testimony and motion for summary disposition. Plaintiffs contend that the circuit…

3Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Spalding v. SpaldingMichigan Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Macarthur Patton Christian Ass'n v. Farm Bureau Insurance GroupMichigan Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Kurczewski v. State Highway CommissionMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. Banaszewski v. ColmanMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983
  5. Middleton v. MargulisMichigan Court of Appeals · 1987

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API