Legal Opinion

Nielsen v. Bell

Utah Supreme Court

Decided March 24, 2016No. Case No. 20131047Published

1Opinion of the Court

This opinion is subject to revision before final publication in the Pacific Reporter

2015 UT 14

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF UTAH COREY AND CAROL NIELSEN, for and in behalf of C.N., a minor, Appellees, v. WADE AND LAURA BELL, on behalf of B.B., a minor Appellants. No. 20131047 Filed March 24, 2016 On Appeal of Interlocutory Order Third District, Salt Lake Dep’t The Honorable Denise P. Lindberg No. 120903223 Attorneys: Daniel F. Bertch, Kevin K. Robson, Darren A. Davis, Nathan Langston, Salt Lake City, for appellees Peter H. Christensen, Kathryn T. Smith, Salt Lake City, for appellants…

Also in this document: Dissent · Lee; Dissent · Lee.

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Roper v. SimmonsSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  2. Lester v. SaylesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1993
  3. Graham v. RolandsonMontana Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Mangam v. . Brooklyn R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1868
  5. Daniels v. Gamma West Brachytherapy, LLCUtah Supreme Court · 2009

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API