Legal Opinion
Candari v. Los Angeles Unified School District
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 8, 2011No. B218306PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
GRIMES, J.
The sole issue presented on appeal is whether the trial court committed error in issuing a peremptory writ of mandate directing defendant and appellant Los Angeles Unified School District Personnel Commission (Commission) to vacate that portion of its administrative order of April 16, 2008, denying backpay to plaintiff and respondent Steven Candari and remanding to the Commission to determine the amount of backpay owed to Candari. We find no error and affirm.
FACTS
Candari was hired by defendant and appellant Los Angeles Unified School District (LAUSD)1 in 1997. In 2006,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Bixby v. PiernoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Fukuda v. City of AngelsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
- Parker v. Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corp.California Supreme Court · 1970
- Kazensky v. City of MercedCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- Harris v. Alcoholic Beverage Control Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Mize-Kurzman v. Marin Community College DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- San Diego County Health & Human Services Agency v. Carlos R.California Court of Appeal · 2012
- San Diego Unified School District v. Commission on Professional CompetenceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- Cordero-Sacks v. Housing AuthorityCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- Crawford v. Comm. on Prof. Competence etc.California Court of Appeal · 2020
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.