Legal Opinion

Paul Stout v. William H. Dallman

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided February 22, 1974No. 73-1166PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PHILLIPS, Chief Judge.

Paul Stout appeals from the denial of his application for writ of habeas corpus.

At a jury trial in the Court of Common Pleas of Butler County, Ohio, Stout was convicted of armed robbery in violation of Ohio Revised Code § 2901.13, which provides as follows: “No person, while armed with a pistol, knife, or other dangerous weapon, by force or violence, or by putting in fear, shall steal from the person of another anything of value.”

He was sentenced to imprisonment of not less than ten years nor more than twenty-five years.

His conviction was affirmed by the Butler County…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Screws v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  3. Lanzetta v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  4. Jordan v. De GeorgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  5. United States v. PetrilloSupreme Court of the United States · 1947

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Diebold, Inc. v. MarshallCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1978
  2. United States v. Betty SalisburyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
  3. Sabetti v. DiPaoloCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
  4. State v. ValenciaNebraska Supreme Court · 1980
  5. United States v. HedrickDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2002

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API