State ex rel. Chuvalas v. Tompkins
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
In her sole proposition of law, Chuvalas asserts that the court of appeals erred in denying the writ because extraordinary relief in mandamus is appropriate when a public employer like DHS fails to comply with a State Personnel Board of Review order.
For the following reasons, however, this assertion lacks merit, and the court of appeals correctly denied the writ.
First, DHS complied with the board’s order. The board never adopted the parties’ agreed entry and settlement agreement as a board order. Instead, the board merely noted that the agreement had been filed with it and relied on the fact…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State ex rel. Willis v. SheboyOhio Supreme Court · 1983
- State ex rel. Spencer v. East Liverpool Planning CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1997
- State ex rel. Minor v. EschenOhio Supreme Court · 1995
- Sanitary Commercial Services, Inc. v. ShankOhio Supreme Court · 1991
- State Ex Rel. Hess v. City of AkronOhio Supreme Court · 1937
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State ex rel. Turner v. HoukOhio Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. MillerOhio Supreme Court · 2023
- State Ex Rel. Widmar v. Mohney, 2007-G-2776 (3-7-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
- Crane v. Perry County Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 2005
- Worthy v. HawthorneOhio Court of Appeals · 2021
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.