Legal Opinion
(HC) Luedtke v. Lake
District Court, E.D. California
Decided August 13, 2019No. 1:19-cv-01034Unknown
1Opinion
2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 10 JAMES LUEDTKE, 1:19-cv-1034-SKO (HC) 11 Petitioner, ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR 12 APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL v. 13 (Doc. 2) 14 S. LAKE, 15 Respondent. 16 17 Petitioner has requested the appointment of counsel. There currently exists no 18 absolute right to appointment of counsel in habeas proceedings. See, e.g., Anderson v. 19 Heinze,
258 F.2d 479, 481
(9th Cir. 1958); Mitchell v. Wyrick,
727 F.2d 773, 774
(8th Cir. 20 1984). However, Title 18 U.S.C. ' 3006A(a)(2)(B) authorizes the appointment of counsel 21 at any stage of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Harrington v. RichterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Robert Anderson v. Robert A. Heinze, Warden, Folsom State PrisonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1958
- Johnny Mitchell v. Donald WyrickCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1984
- Green v. Van BuskirkSupreme Court of the United States · 1866