Legal Opinion

Herbert v. Perry

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 4, 1937No. 2 Div. 107PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMAS, Justice.

In the absence of a demurrer, or any contention to the contrary, we shall construe and' treat the bill in this cause as showing an actual existing controversy between the parties, which we are called upon to determine under the authority conferred upon the courts by our Declaratory Judgment Law (Gen.Aets 1935, p. 777). We shall therefore pretermit consideration of any question as to any technical defect in the pleadings. The parties have treated the pleadings as sufficient to invoke the jurisdiction of the court, and we are proceeding upon that theory:

The bill sought a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Kimmons v. Jefferson County Board of EducationSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920
  2. Littlejohn v. LittlejohnSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
  3. Board of Revenue Shelby County v. Farson, Son & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1916
  4. Houston County v. CovingtonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
  5. In Re Opinions of the JusticesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Harman v. Alabama CollegeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
  2. Klein v. Jefferson County Building & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Alabama · 1940
  3. Isbell v. Shelby CountySupreme Court of Alabama · 1938
  4. State v. InmanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
  5. Marion County v. MiddletonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1945

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API