Legal Opinion

Sipple v. Haltom

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided October 28, 1927No. 12,997PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McMahan, J. —

Mary Ann Haltom filed her application with the Industrial Board for compensation because of the death of her husband, Morris W. Haltom, which is alleged to have been the result of an accidental injury which arose out of and in the course of his employ ment by Frank Sipple, William Dickey and James Sipple as partners. On final hearing', compensation was awarded in the sum of $7.70 per week for not to exceed 300 weeks. Following the award, the three named defendants and the Indiana Liberty. Mutual Insurance Company filed a praecipe for a transcript for use in an appeal to this…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Carr v. CarrIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Campbell-Smith-Ritchie Co. v. SoudersIndiana Court of Appeals · 1917

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Southern Surety Co. v. ArterTexas Commission of Appeals · 1932
  2. Chilen v. Commercial Casualty InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API