Mississippi Power & Light Co. v. United Gas Pipe Line Co.
District Court, S.D. Mississippi
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
TOM S. LEE, District Judge.
Introduction
This diversity action arises out of an agreement entered into between plaintiff, United Gas Pipe Line Company (United), and defendant, Mississippi Power and Light Company (MP & L). Presently before the court are the cross motions of United and MP & L for partial summary judgment on count III of United’s counterclaim. Each party has responded to the motion of the opposing party, and the court has considered the memoranda with attachments submitted by the parties in ruling on the motion.
Parties and Facts
MP & L is a public…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Dennis v. SearleMississippi Supreme Court · 1984
- Pfisterer v. NobleMississippi Supreme Court · 1975
- Johnson, Drake & Piper, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1976
- Putman v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaDistrict Court, N.D. Mississippi · 1987
- Bolling Federal Credit Union v. Cumis Insurance Society, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Construction Interior Systems, Inc. v. Donohoe CompaniesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1992
- Penn Cent. Corp. v. United StatesSpecial Court under the Regional Rail Reorganization Act · 1994
- Lund, et al. v. CitizensDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 1999