Legal Opinion
Royal Insurance v. Cathy Daniels, Ltd.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided September 4, 1987No. 85 Civ. 8665 (RWS)PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
Third-party defendants Alexander & Alexander and American Coverage Corp. (collectively “A & A”) have moved for an order pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 14(c) for leave to commence a fourth-party action against Total Maintenance, Inc. (“Total”) and Cowan Sportswear, Inc. (“Cowan”). Defendant and third-party plaintiff Cathy Daniels, Ltd. (“Daniels”) opposes A & A’s motion on the grounds that the purported fourth-party action is unrelated to the underlying claims already before the court. Upon the following facts and conclusions, A & A’s motion is denied.
Prior Proceedings
Pla…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Dery v. WyerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1959
- Rosario v. Amalgamated Ladies' Garment Cutters' Union, Local 10Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
- Index Fund, Inc. v. HagopianDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1976
- Old Republic Insurance v. Concast, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1983
- Standard Fire Insurance v. Boyceharvey MacHinery, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1953
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- ANTHONY v. PROGRESSIVE LEASINGDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2020