Legal Opinion

Herron v. Fox

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided November 16, 1939No. File No. 8243PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

Defendants have appealed from an order of the trial court denying a change of venue to the place of residence of the defendants. The action was brought in Minnehaha County. In his complaint the plaintiff 'stated his cause of action in substance as follows: That theretofore the defendants had purchased certain personal property located in Minnehaha County from plaintiff under a conditional sales contract, a copy of which was annexed to the complaint; that the defendants had defaulted in the payment of the purchase price; that no proceedings had been had at law for the recovery of the sums…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Aldrich v. Public Opinion Pub. Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1911
  2. White v. Chicago, M. & St. P. Ry. Co.Supreme Court Of The Territory Of Dakota · 1889
  3. Irwin v. TaubmanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Barbour v. FidlerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1913
  5. La Penotiere v. KellarSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1912

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Adrian v. McKinnieSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Putnam Ranches, Inc. v. O'Neill Production Credit Ass'nSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1978
  3. American Advertising Co. v. State Ex Rel. Department of TransportationSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
  4. City of Rapid City v. StateSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Blair v. Scherle Irrigation Sales, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1977

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API