Legal Opinion

Amaya v. Newberry's 3N Mill

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided April 9, 2008No. CA 07-939PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Larry D. Vaught, Judge.

Appellant Marcos Amaya sustained a compensable injury to his back on June 2, 2004, when he stepped into a hole while attempting to carry a part of a heavy tree during the course of his employment with appellee Newberry’s 3N Mill. On appeal, he argues that the Workers’ Compensation Commission erred in its decision that he was not entitled to additional temporary partial disability benefits and that he was not entitled to additional medical treatment (back surgery). We affirm in part and reverse in part.

Following his undisputed compensable injury, Amaya was treated by Dr.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Poulan Weed Eater v. MarshallCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2002
  2. Arkansas State Highway & Transportation Department v. BreshearsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1981
  3. Kimbell v. Association of Rehab Industry & Business Companion Property & CasualtySupreme Court of Arkansas · 2006
  4. Gansky v. Hi-Tech EngineeringSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
  5. Arbaugh v. AG Processing, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2005

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Burkett v. Exxon Tiger Mart, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2009
  2. Delaplaine Farm Center v. CraftonCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2011
  3. Fuller v. Pope Cnty. JudgeCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2018
  4. Kymira Gant v. First Step, Inc., and Risk Management ResourcesCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2023
  5. Serena Dodson v. Valley Behavioral Health SystemsCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2022

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API