Legal Opinion
Abdulrazzak v. Warembourg
District Court, D. South Dakota
Decided November 1, 2022No. 4:22-cv-04099Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA SOUTHERN DIVISION HAIDER ABDULRAZZAK, 4:22-CV-04099-KES Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S vs. MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS AND 1915 SCREENING CHARISSA WAREMBOURG, in her ORDERING SERVICE individual capacity; ANGELIA M. GRIES, in her individual capacity; KARL THOENNES, in his individual capacity; MINNEHAHA COUNTY, in its individual and official capacity; CITY OF SIOUX FALLS, in its individual and official capacity, Defendants. Plaintiff, Haider Abdulrazzak, filed a pro se civil rights lawsuit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Docket 1.…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lewis v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1996
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.