Legal Opinion
Loeckle v. State Farm Automobile Insurance
District Court, N.D. Iowa
Decided July 28, 1999No. C98-3025-MWBPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER REGARDING DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
BENNETT, District Judge.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. INTRODUCTION.841
II. STANDARDS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT.842
III. FACTUAL BACKGROUND.844
A. Uncontested Facts.844
B. Contested Facts.846
TV. LEGAL ANALYSIS.846
A. Employment Relationship Requirement.846
B. Determination of Employee Status.846
C. Application Of The Hybrid Test.848
1. State Farm Auto’s riyht to control and supervise Loeckle.849
2. Other hybrid test factors.849
D. Loeckle’s Disability Claims Ayainst State Farm Fire.850
1. “Reyarded as haviny” a disability . .851
2.…
2Cases cited113 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
108 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Maria Wortham v. American Family Insurance Group Dave Vore, Bob CarnineCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2004
- Barnes v. Northwest Iowa Health CenterDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 2002
- Pooneh Glascock v. Linn County Emergency MedicineCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2012
- Richards v. Farner-Bocken Co.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 2001
- Hog Slat, Inc. v. EbertDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 2000
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.