Legal Opinion

Odd Fellows' Savings Bank v. Banton

California Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1873No. 3,742PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of the Third Judicial District, County of Alameda. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court, Belcher, J.:

This is an appeal by the defendants Hammett and Kings-bury from a judgment foreclosing three mortgages, and the only question presented for determination in the case is as to the priority of the mortgage liens. The facts upon which the question arises are substantially as follows: On the 13th of January, 1873, the defendant Banton executed and delivered to the defendant Hammett a mortgage upon certain lands in the City and County of San Francisco, which was properly recorded in the office of the County Recorder of said city *606and county on the fifteenth of the…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bullock v. RouseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Seal of Gold Mining Co. v. SlaterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Tappendorff v. DowningCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Peter v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  5. Daubenbiss v. WhiteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API