Legal Opinion

Application of Raymond M. Dodson

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided July 21, 1961No. Patent Appeal 6703PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN, Judge.

This is an appeal from a decision of the Patent Office Board of Appeals affirming the examiner’s rejection of all of the claims of appellant’s application for a patent on “l-Aryl-3-Hydroxypropyl Sulfones” and a process of making them.

Appealed claims 1 through 8 are for organic compounds with varying degrees of specificity. Appealed claims 9 and 10 recite a step in a process for preparing the claimed compounds. The following claims are representative:

“1. A compound of the formula

wherein R is selected from the group consisting of methyl and phenyl radicals, R' is selected from the…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Application of Carl Peter KrimmelCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1961

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Brenner v. MansonSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Carter-Wallace, Inc. v. Riverton Laboratories, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1969
  3. Application of David Neville Kirk and Vladimir PetrowCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1967
  4. Application of George H. Hitchings, Gertrude B. Elion and Irving GoodmanCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1965
  5. Application of Robert R. CitronCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1964

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API