Legal Opinion

United States v. Skurla

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided December 2, 1954No. Cr. Nos. 14111-14114, 14148, 14106-14110, 14116, 14149PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GOURLEY, Chief Judge.

In connection with divers indictments returned by the grand jury on March 4, 1954, commonly known as the vote fraud indictments, numerous motions have been filed before this court.

For purposes of clarity the indictments have been classified in specific categories for disposition of the issues presented.

The following opinions are herein reported :

I. Motion to produce records of the grand jury.

II. Motions to quash indictments:(a) Conspiracy to intimidate indictments, 126 F.Supp. 713.(b) Bribery indictments, 126 F.Supp. 718.(c) Perjury indictment, 126 F.Supp. 720.

Motion to…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. United States v. Maurice RoseCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1954
  2. Frisbie v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  3. United States v. SmythDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1952
  4. Metzler v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1933
  5. United States v. AlperCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1946

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In Re Special February 1971 Grand Jury, Howard Jachimowski v. James B. Conlisk, Jr., Superintendent of PoliceCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1973
  2. United States v. MelekhDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1961
  3. In Re Jessup's PetitionSuperior Court of Delaware · 1957
  4. Arlington Glass Co. v. Pittsburgh Plate Glass Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API