Legal Opinion

Davis v. Avondale Industries, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided October 16, 1992No. 90-3800PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GARWOOD, Circuit Judge:

Plaintiff-appellant Carol Frances Davis (Davis) appeals the reduction of her jury award for damages in her product liability and negligence action. Defendants-appel-lees-cross-appellants Engelhard Corp. (En-gelhard) and Aufhauser Brothers Corp. (Aufhauser), appeal the judgment against them on the ground that the trial judge refused their requested jury instruction. *171Because we find that the trial court erred in refusing to include the substance of this instruction in its charge to the jury, we reverse and remand. We do not reach the issues raised in Davis’ appeal.

Facts…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Beale v. HardyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1985
  2. George Pierce and Jeff Pierce, Individually and D/B/A Pierce Sales, a Partnership v. Ramsey Winch Company, a Foreign Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
  3. Betty Adams, Joseph Adams v. Union Carbide CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984
  4. Goodbar v. Whitehead Bros.District Court, W.D. Virginia · 1984
  5. Alvin J. Treadaway, and Fidelity & Casualty Company of New York, Intervenor-Appellee v. Societe Anonyme Louis-Dreyfus Et CieCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Pfeifer v. John Crane, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2013
  2. Abadie v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2001
  3. Swope v. Columbian Chemicals Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002
  4. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Manville Sales Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
  5. Black v. Gorman-RuppLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1995

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API