Legal Opinion

United States Ex Rel. Hughes v. Cook

District Court, S.D. Mississippi

Decided September 30, 1980No. Civ. A. J79-0106(R)PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF SUMMARY JUDGMENT FOR ALL DEFENDANTS

DAN M. RUSSELL, Jr., Chief Judge.

I

FINDINGS OF FACT

This is a qui tam or informer action brought by plaintiff, Ralph Hughes, Sr. (“Hughes”), acting pro se, against nine separate defendants all of whom are medical doctors practicing in various localities throughout Mississippi. Hughes’ previously was enjoined by the Chancery Court of Lee County, Mississippi from continuing the unlicensed practice of osteopathic medicine. 1

Proceeding under the False Claims Act, 31 U.S.C. § 231 et seq., 2 plaintiff alleged…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. United States Ex Rel. Marcus v. HessSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. United States v. Neifert-White Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Rainwater v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  4. United States v. McNinchSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  5. Peterson v. WeinbergerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. Stelweck (In Re Stelweck)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1988
  2. United States of America, ex rel. Cameron Jehl v. GGNSC Southaven LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Mississippi · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API