Legal Opinion

Sanders v. State Highway Department

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided April 7, 1948No. 16065PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Stukes, Justice:

The plaintiff, now appellant, in this action was seriously injured in a collision between his automobile, which he was driving, and the automobile of one Marcus Still. The suit for damages is against the State Highway Department upon allegations of negligent maintenance of the highway which resulted in an unsafe condition of the surface of the road for travel and the growth of weeds along the road which it is claimed obstructed the vision of the driver.

The trial judge overruled motions by the defendant for nonsuit and for directed verdict and the jury found for the plaintiff…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lusk v. State Highway DepartmentSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1936
  2. Lee v. Northwestern R. R.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1909
  3. Bunton v. South Carolina State Highway DepartmentSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1938
  4. Cooper v. South Carolina Highway DepartmentSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1937
  5. Ralph v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1931

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. McCall v. BatsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1985
  2. McCall ex rel. Andrews v. BatsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1985
  3. Highbarger v. ThornockIdaho Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Mullins Hospital v. SquiresSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1958
  5. Gillespie v. FORDSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1952

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API