Legal Opinion

William Cheng v. Arthur Osterback

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided October 5, 2017No. 16-15759UnpublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM **

Chapter 7 debtors William P. Cheng and Janet Cheng appeal pro se from the district court’s order dismissing the Chengs’ bankruptcy appeal. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. §§ 158(d) and 1291. We affirm.

In their opening brief, the Chengs fail to address how the district court erred by dismissing their appeal for failure to comply with the court’s order and as moot. As a result, the Chengs have waived their challenge to the district court’s order. See Smith v. Marsh, 194 F.3d 1045, 1052 (9th Cir. 1999) (“[0]n appeal, arguments not raised by a party in its opening brief are…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ashley Hunt Greenwood v. Federal Aviation AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
  2. Smith v. MarshCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Sutton v. Eagle Vista Equities LLCDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API