Legal Opinion
Sealite, Inc. v. Finster
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 1, 1957No. Civ. 17108PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
This is an action for the recovery of certain equipment and materials allegedly taken without right by defendant and damages for the illegal taking. Judgment was for defendant. Plaintiff appeals from said judgment and from an order denying its motion for a new trial. Said order being nonappealable, the appeal from it will be dismissed.
Defendant and respondent George Finster was duly appointed by the Alameda Superior Court a receiver in the matter of Gardner, cross-plaintiff, vs. E. K. Ferguson; E. K. Ferguson, Jr., Gordon A. Ferguson and Reed C. Ferguson, copartners doing business…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- McNulta v. LochridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Miller v. PetersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- Industrial Indemnity Co. v. Golden State Co.California Court of Appeal · 1953
- Sands v. Eagle Oil & Refining Co.California Court of Appeal · 1948
- Bank of America v. CarrCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Galdjie v. DarwishCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
- Credit Managers Ass'n of Southern California v. Kennesaw Life & Accident InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Credit Managers Association Of Southern California v. Kennesaw Life And Accident Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Berry v. City of Santa BarbaraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
- McCarthy v. PoulsenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.