Legal Opinion
Frankenberry v. Williams
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Decided January 26, 1988No. Civ. A. 86-1241PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
RAMBO, District Judge.
Before the court is defendants’ motion to dismiss or, in the alternative, for summary judgment. The motion has been briefed and is ripe for disposition.
Background
The following facts are not in dispute. 1 Plaintiff, an inmate at the Lewisburg Federal Penitentiary at the time he initiated this action, was required to submit a urine sample to prison officials on April 4, 1986 in accordance with that institution’s program of testing for illegal drug use through the means of urine surveillance. Plaintiff’s urine sample was tested by PharmChem Laboratories…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Hewitt v. HelmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Phillip Wallace v. Merle Dean RobinsonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
- Von Kahl v. BrennanDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1994
- MacLean v. SecorDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1995
- Flanagan v. Warden, U.S. PenitentiaryDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1992
- Adkins v. MartinDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1988
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.