Legal Opinion

Phipps v. Phipps

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided November 26, 1993No. 20126PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BISTLINE, Justice.

BACKGROUND AND PRIOR PROCEEDINGS

Mr. and Mrs. Phipps were divorced by decree of the district court in Washington County, Idaho, on August 10, 1982. Because Mr. Phipps received more than one-half of the couple’s community property in the divorce, he and Mrs. Phipps executed an agreement whereby he would pay her either the greater of $300, or one-third of his monthly retirement benefits until she either remarried or died. The agreement stated as follows:

4. ADDITIONAL AGREEMENTS: That as an equalizhtion of the community property, as the husband is receiving more than half of the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Philpott v. Essex County Welfare BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Robert Tidwell v. Richard Schweiker, Etc., and Ivan Pavkovic, Etc., Robert Schreckenberg v. Richard S. Schweiker, Etc., and Ivan Pavkovic, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
  3. Moore v. ColauttiDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1979
  4. Robinson v. Joint Sch. Dist. No. 331 MinidokaIdaho Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Murray v. Farmers InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 1990

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Langley v. State, Industrial Special Indemnity FundIdaho Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Saint Alphonsus Regional Medical Center v. BannonIdaho Supreme Court · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API