Legal Opinion
Doran v. Wells
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 19, 2012PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
On their motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability, the plaintiffs established their prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by demonstrating that the injured plaintiffs vehicle was fully stopped at a red traffic light when it was struck in the rear by the defendant’s vehicle (see Tutrani v County of Suffolk, 10 NY3d 906, 908 [2008]; Pollard v Independent Beauty & Barber Supply Co., 94 AD3d 845, 845-846 [2012]; Balducci v Velasquez, 92 AD3d 626, 628-629 [2012]). However, in opposition, the defendant, who allegedly experienced a hypoglycemic attack immediately before…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Tutrani v. County of SuffolkNew York Court of Appeals · 2008
- Balducci v. VelasquezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Pollard v. Independent Beauty & Barber Supply Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Thomas v. HulslanderAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Romero v. Metropolitan Suburban Bus AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Pitt v. MrozAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- Serpas v. BellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Serpas v. BellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014