Legal Opinion
Pimentel v. United States Drug Enforcement Administration
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided June 7, 2000No. 96Civ.9021(PKL)PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
LEISURE, District Judge.
Plaintiff pro se Hipólito Uvidalis Pimen-tel seeks the return of property allegedly seized by defendant United States Drug Enforcement Administration (the “DEA”). Both parties have moved for summary judgment. For the reasons that follow, each motion is granted in part and denied in part.
BACKGROUND
Plaintiff, his wife Wanda, and their two children resided at 2752 East 66th Street, Brooklyn, New York, between 1987 and 1991. See Pimentel Dep. at 12-13, 19-20. From 1987 to 1990, plaintiff worked as a freelance limousine driver, using his Lincoln Towncar to…
2Cases cited64 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Akey v. Clinton CountyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
- Richardson v. RichardsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Herrin v. TreonDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2006
- Czetwertynski v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2007
- Akey v. Clinton CountyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.