Legal Opinion

Troxell v. Welch

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided January 2, 1985No. WD 35590PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LOWENSTEIN, Presiding Judge.

Appellant, Dotte Troxell, and respondent, Kenneth Welch, own adjoining farms near Lexington, Missouri where both raise cattle. The facts and history of this litigation are very confusing. This preliminary overview is presented before the individual points of error are attempted to be dealt with. In October 1974 the parties entered into an oral contract to combine their herds for breeding purposes. Troxell would be responsible for the care and management of the entire herd, with Welch paying for expenses relating to his cattle plus being responsible for cutting and…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Sharon Hageman, Admx. Of the Estate of Donald Hageman v. Signal L. P. Gas, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1973
  2. State Ex Rel. Normandy Orthopedics, Inc. v. CrandallSupreme Court of Missouri · 1979
  3. Goodman v. PolandDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1975
  4. Hamm v. HammMissouri Court of Appeals · 1969
  5. De Malherbe v. International Union of Elevator ConstructorsDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1978

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Slankard v. ThomasMissouri Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. Knapp v. Missouri Local Government Employees Retirement SystemMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. Derek Luebbert v. Global Control Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2021
  4. Edgar v. RumaMissouri Court of Appeals · 1991
  5. Link v. IseMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API