Legal Opinion

O'Connor v. Solomon

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided January 28, 1926PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMaltbie, J.

The appellant, plaintiff in the court below, both there and here has herself prosecuted the case, although she is wholly without training or experience in legal procedure. A party who, unskilled in such matters, seeks to remedy some claimed wrong by invoking processes which are at best technical and complicated, is very ill advised and assumes a most difficult task. Our courts, however, have always been lenient toward such an one, relaxing the rules wherever it can be done with propriety, and the record before us is replete with evidence that every reasonable assistance was given to the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Glidewell v. Murray-Lacy & Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1919
  2. Railroad Co. v. Hardware Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  3. Austin, Nichols Co., Inc. v. GilmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1923
  4. Dickerson v. SchwabacherSupreme Court of Alabama · 1912
  5. Dixon v. Smith-Wallace Shoe Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1918

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Gray v. Stillman White Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1987
  2. Rodriguez v. Mallory Battery Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
  3. Swenson v. DittnerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
  4. Cersosimo v. CersosimoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
  5. Varga v. ParelesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1951

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API