Legal Opinion · Dissent

Jasper County Lumber Co. v. Smith

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 11, 1938No. 3115Published

1Dissent

I am unable to agree with my brethren that this judgment should be affirmed. The controlling question is one of abandonment. I shall not undertake to restate the facts disclosed by the record. For a full statement of all the facts, reference is made to the records on former appeals. See Smith v. Jasper County Lumber Co., Tex. Civ. App.46 S.W.2d 430; Id., 124 Tex. 156, 76 S.W.2d 505; Jasper County Lumber Co. v. Smith, Tex. Civ. App. 91 S.W.2d 834. Also majority opinion herein.

The time limit for the removal of the timber was 15 years. The timber was bought and paid for in 1922. Before the limit…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Smith v. Jasper County Lumber Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Smith v. Jasper County Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1932
  3. Cammack v. R-L Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1924
  4. Jasper County Lumber Co. of Texas v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API