Legal Opinion
Araiza v. National Steel and Shipbuilding Co.
District Court, S.D. California
Decided July 23, 1997No. Civil 97-0819-B(LSP)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS
BREWSTER, District Judge.
On June 10, 1997, Defendants filed a motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1). Plaintiffs are represented by Dennis Grady and Jeff Geraci of Grady and Associates. Defendants are represented by John Klinedinst and Garrett Gillespie of Klinedinst, Fliehman & McKillop. After careful consideration of the moving and opposing papers, the Court hereby DENIES Defendants’motion to dismiss.
I. Background
Antonio Araiza worked for Defendant National Steel and…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Alexander v. Gardner-Denver Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Gilmer v. Interstate/Johnson Lane Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Lingle v. Norge Division of Magic Chef, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Deschene v. Pinole Point Steel Co.California Court of Appeal · 1999
- Torrez v. Consolidated Freightways Corp. of DelawareCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
- Chopra v. Display Producers, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1997