Legal Opinion

Clink v. Gunn

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 5, 1892PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error to Muskegon. (Dickerman, J.) Trover. Defendant brings error. The facts -are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.

May 14, 1889, plaintiff was the owner of 320 acres of land on section 12, Fruitport township, Muskegon county, upon which one John Williams held a mortgage of $1,500. On that’day plaintiff gave Williams a deed of the premises, and took back from him an agreement to reconvey upon the payment of that sum with interest. January 25, 1890, Williams conveyed the premises to Charles L. Gunn, the defendant, for the pretended consideration of $1,922.64. These deeds were ■duly recorded. Subsequently the plaintiff tendered the amount, with the interest, and filed a bill to compel a reconveyance of the…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Kerr v. National Fulton Brass Manufacturing Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Hughes v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Marsh v. BurnhamMichigan Supreme Court · 1920
  4. People v. FieldMichigan Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Turner v. Muskegon Machine & Foundry Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1893

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API