Legal Opinion
United States v. Jimenez-Beltre
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided March 9, 2006No. 05-1268PublishedCited by 133 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION EN BANC
BOUDIN, Chief Judge.
A year has now passed since the Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005), and courts are being asked to review sentences imposed under the post-Booker advisory guidelines regime. See United States v. Pho, 433 F.3d 53 (1st Cir.2006); United States v. Robinson, 433 F.3d 31 (1st Cir.2005). We have heard this case en banc to provide stable guidance in this circuit for the determination and review of post -Booker sentences.
The facts of the present case are generally not in dispute. Cambridge,…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Almendarez-Torres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Shepard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by133 opinions
- Rita v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- United States v. CartyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. Benigno Montes-Pineda, A/K/A No. Benigno Pineda Muntez, A/K/A Benigno Montez-Pineda, A/K/A Benigno Pineda-MontesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2006
- United States v. Ofray-CamposCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2008
- United States v. Artez Lamont JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2006
128 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.