In Re Jackson Lockdown/MCO Cases
District Court, E.D. Michigan
1Opinion of the Court
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. The Procedural Background 872
A. Consolidation of Cases 872
B. The Motions to Dismiss 872
II. The Facts as Alleged 873
III. The 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Claim 875
A. MCO Motion: State Action 875
B. State Motion 877
1. Personal Involvement 878
2. Constitutionality of Post-Riot Conditions 878
IV. The 42 U.S.C. § 1985(3) Claim 878
A. Elements of a § 1985(3) Claim 878
TABLE OF CONTENTS
B. Intra-corporate Conspiracy Exception 879
C. Class-based Animus Requirement 880
1. Legislative History 880
2. Sixth Circuit Case Law 881
3. McDonald’s Allegations 883
V. The 42 U.S.C. § 1985(2) Claim 885
VI. The 42…
2Cases cited54 opinions
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Edelman v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Polk County v. DodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Monroe v. PapeSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Citizens Insurance Co. of America v. DaccachTexas Supreme Court · 2007
- Timothy William HISER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Richard H. FRANKLIN; Frank Sauser; Al Terrault, Defendants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- In re Yahoo Mail LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2015
- Cholakyan v. Mercedes-Benz USA, LLCDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2012
- Coleman v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2004
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.