Legal Opinion
Clark v. BP Oil Co.
District Court, E.D. Tennessee
Decided May 17, 1996No. 3:94-cv-0763PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
JORDAN, District Judge.
For the reasons stated in the court’s memorandum opinion filed with this order, the court finds the defendants’ motions to dismiss or for summary judgment [docs. 18 and 20] well taken in part, and they are GRANTED IN PART. It is ORDERED that the plaintiff’s claims against the defendants in this civil action are DISMISSED, except his claims on the theories that one or more of the defendants are liable for breach of contract for inadequate performance of the dealer lease and supply agreement in issue; that the defendants BP Oil Company and BP Does 1-50 granted orally…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Carnegie-Mellon University v. CohillSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,768 Phil A. Street and Clyde H. Street v. J.C. Bradford & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
- May-Som Gulf, Inc. v. Chevron U.S.A., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989
- Consumers Petroleum Co. v. Texaco, Inc., a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986
- Petry v. Cosmopolitan Spa International, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1982
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Jeetendra L. Shukla, Individually v. Bp Exploration & Oil, Inc., A.K.A. Bp Oil Company, Petro Distributing, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997
- Terry R. Beachler, Randall A. Greene, Wayne T. Neal v. Amoco Oil Company, Johnson Oil Company, and Smith Oil Company of KankakeeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
- Sawhney v. Mobil Oil Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1997
- Koylum, Inc. v. Peksen Realty Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 2002
- Richardson v. BP Oil Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.